Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaleptic art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metaleptic art

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no references or citations withing the article that would be in standing to support this article. Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} 23:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The name of the person to whom this is (sort of) attributed is misspelled, it's not Jane but Jean Baudrillard. According to the definition of metalepsis, this would be a valid concept, but a strict search for the term seems to indicate this is something someone made up with no notability and thus fails the test for neologisms. It certainly is not anything related to Baudrillard's work, unless I'm missing sources in French or German or some other language. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:02, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Aargh. Johnbod (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a widely-used term, as Google search shows: there's one guy talking about it in his blog and a few other people who use the adjective to describe art without referring to a particular style or movement. I don't see any value in redirecting to metalepsis which isn't about this narrow definition, so a straight delete is best. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.